Week One: Observations and Adjustments

Bonjour from Paris!

The first week or so in Paris has been a weird one. I wish there was a more eloquent way to put it, but that about sums it up. It's been full of challenges, both big and small. My week has consisted of catching flights, sitting through hours of orientation, and adapting to living in a tiny French apartment with a tiny French woman named Chantal, her tiny French dog named Julia, and my roommate from Colorado named Betty. Not to mention trying to wake up the part of my brain that knows French but hasn't had to do any heavy lifting since Junior year of high school. Between all of this madness, I've found an abundance of time to be in awe of everything around me. Even the little things, like how there's really detailed and ornate graffiti everywhere, how truly remarkable it is that everyone ignores traffic laws or how tiny the glasses are (I'm talking 3 ounces at the most) are cause for amazement, as menial as it sounds. And the bigger things are too, of course. Like how I can see the Eiffel Tower from my host mom's window (lit up in all of her golden, night-time glory), how we're in the middle of three separate protests/strikes happening all at once which is completely normal (did you know France has around 250 protests annually?) or how my art history course will be meeting at museums rather than in the classroom most days. Things that aren't that new and aren't that exciting are both new and exciting here in addition to all of the classic but still marvelous tourist-y side of things. Nothing goes unnoticed. I imagine I look a little bit like a goldfish these days; wide-eyes trying to absorb the very air around me. Hopefully, that will go away with time (although I have a sneaking suspicion that it won't).

Rather than give you the play by play for my week, I've decided on a list of things I've picked up through my conversations with my host mom and what we learned at orientation. Although they are mostly generalizations that may not apply to everyone, I think that these have been the most interesting things I have come across so far and have really made my first week here incredibly entertaining.
  • The French aren't rude, they're just introverts.
    • The French are actually an extraordinarily polite people, their rules are just different from ours. Whenever you walk into a shop, onto an elevator or ask for directions you are expected to greet whoever is in there. Same for when you leave. This isn't an invitation to start a conversation, after all, the French are notoriously Private individuals, but it's a polite acknowledgment of the other person and the fact that you sharing the space with them. The French are known to be brisk, and although this is true to some extent, it isn't from a place from malice. There aren't words in their language that allow for the passive-aggressive, beating-around-the-bush conversations we have in the U.S. I find that when I'm struggling to convey what I mean in French, it's typically because I am trying to express it in a very "American" way. Once I let go of the different expectations I'm still operating under from our culture, it becomes far easier to communicate. If you're courteous, ask questions, and don't take things too personally, you'll be fine. Just as long as you don't try to make friends in line at the supermarket or take up too much room on the escalator.
  • Always try to speak French first, even if your pronunciation needs work.
    • French people really appreciate it when non-French speakers try to communicate in French, even if it's difficult. Most Parisians under the age of 50 know at least some English and will be glad to help as long as you try and start off in French. For example, if you are asking for directions, they are far more likely to help if you begin with a greeting and ask if they speak English in French before switching over to English. Even if your pronunciation is horrible, they appreciate the effort. Sometimes, they might correct you, but it isn't out of disdain, they're trying to be helpful, there just isn't a good way to translate that across cultures, especially one that as I said before, specializes in bluntness. One of our staff members told us that often when older folks correct your French it's out of their own discomfort because they can't speak English. Have patience with yourself and others, it's a hard leap to make but they're more than willing to help as they can
  • The French have different priorities as far as standards of living.
    • Parisians use their time, energy, and money differently than we do. Their living spaces are often sparser and smaller (see photos page). We have very strict rules on when we're allowed to take showers and for how long (before 9pm and no longer than 15 minutes). We hang dry all of our clothing because they don't use dryers. Their cars, if they even own them, are tiny and are often electric. Resources like electricity, gas, water, and heat are all conserved as much as possible and you can forget about AC in the summer. On the other hand, they spend a lot more money on high-quality food, clothing, and luxury items. They have found ways to live minimally in terms of things Americans see as standard so that they can take extra vacations and have second apartments in Bordeaux like my host mom does. It's a fascinating switch in terms of priorities and I've found myself starting to think that maybe it makes more sense than the way we do it in the U.S.
  • If you make eye contact and smile at someone it's perceived as you being a. romantically interested in them or b. untrustworthy.
    • As Americans, we are far more likely to make eye contact, if only briefly and offer a smile in an attempt to dissuade any perceptions of ill-intent. The opposite is expected here. Especially since coming from the Mid-West (and going to school at Marietta) where that sort of outward express is integrated into how we interact with each other on a daily basis, it's been a very difficult habit for me to break. How on earth are you supposed to walk down the street and just not make eye contact with people? Not to mention that smiling is basically reflexive... I thought I might never make this adaptation until Thursday evening while walking home from orientation when I smiled as a young girl on the street. She looked so incredibly taken aback that I have found it far easier to keep a straight-face since then. Since all of the mass transportation is unreliable right now due to the transportation union workers being on strike, I find myself walking everywhere (typically well over half an hour in some cases) so this has been a very difficult and crucial cultural difference for me to adapt to, more so than others.
  • Perception is everything here.
    • The French are very aware of how things appear to other people. In orientation, they told us that often, it might feel like we are being judged quickly and it's because we are and that's just that. The French are quick to pass judgments on themselves and other people in an attempt to control the situation. They don't like to not know, to not be prepared, to feel insecure in any given situation so they are often hyperaware in order to keep that from happening. Our student affairs coordinator, Laurie, told us that there is a French saying that is used to remind people that ridiculousness will not kill you. She told us that any culture that needs a saying to be reminded that being human is okay clearly has a long way to go. It's something fo us to lean into and engage with. According to Laurie, the French like to debate, they like to hear what other people think so we shouldn't shy away from this. If we disagree or if we feel that we're being judged too quickly we've been instructed to push back and have that conversation with your host family and other French people we might meet.
I hope that these findings have given you a look into how drastically (and in some ways not so drastically) my life has changed in just a few days. It's a never-ending process of making mistakes, asking questions, and ultimately learning. It constantly keeps me on my toes and honestly, I don't think I would change anything about it. Even the awkwardness of having to make new friends again and the difficulty of speaking French again is absolutely worth the lessons I've learned-- and it's only been a week!

Monday, we start a week of intensive language courses and move into regular courses next week. I am absolutely terrified but also thrilled to be starting classes. It looks like it's going to be an enormous amount of work but I don't think I'm allowed to complain when Paris is my classroom. 

To finish off, I'll leave you with some new terms that I've learned this week that are relevant to life in Paris:
  • Mère d'accueil = host mom
  • Les actualités = current events
  • "Sa suffit!" = "That's enough!" (to use if being harassed by someone on the street)
  • La grève = a strike
  • Manifestation = a protest
À bientôt!

Comments

  1. Your final point about perception intrigues me. All of the reasons for the judgment are aspects of a trauma response in individuals. It makes me wonder to what degree the collective population is affected by the trauma of two world wars and how that reality has shaped the way they approach the world.

    Thanks for the interesting insights. I look forward to learning more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rowan,

    I am very excited to read about your journey in Paris throughout this next semester. Quick question, are the majority of your classmates American? I think it'd be interesting to see how the culture shock affects others if they are not from the United States. Based on what you had mentioned about "smiling" at people in the streets and how Parisians are very introverted makes me wonder how other students may react to that if they are not American. I feel as though many Americans act in this way despite being an introvert or extrovert which may just be a result of our culture. I also wonder if maybe Americans and Parisians are just complete opposites in this sense or if the majority of the world acts this way and we're just very different

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Shelby!

      Most of the other students in the program are American or at least attend college in the United States. Although we share that in terms of cultural background, I have seen a difference in how students from big universities have adapted versus those from smaller ones. We have about 130 people total in the program and all of my courses have fewer than 20 people in them. A lot of the students from big research institutions (for instance we have a lot of GW students and UMN students) have really struggled with having this sort of one on one connection/attention from the faculty that I, being from Marietta, find totally, normal.

      As far as the introversion goes, I think we were all sort of in shock about that, especially since most of us are from the Midwest where that sort of thing is just an expectation. I would be interested to know what other places do too! I have met a few people around the city who are not originally from Paris but have been living here for a while. I'll have to remember to ask them about their adjustment!

      Thanks for the questions!!

      Delete
  3. Hello Rowan,
    In your last post, you made some references to the protests there. I know one of the protests is about pension changes made by the MPs. What I was wondering was with all of that going on, what do Parisians think are the responsibilities of leaders and followers. For instance, as leaders we make decisions based on rationality and logic. The responsibility of the leader is to motivate followers to get some kind of result. The followers’ responsibilities are to be dependable, committed, and motivated. This is clearly seen when we did the jump rope exercise during excel. Typically, one or two people would step up, try new jumps and then someone would “direct” the followers on how many will jump and when. We used logic to try and figure out how to “win” the jump rope game. If someone did not jump in time, they were typically replaced because they were not dependable. In my group specifically, we had one person continuously shout out words of encouragement and direction. So, my question is, is this the same there, or are their leader-followers roles different? If they are different, how is this difference portrayed by the actions of the current protest?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really great question! Get ready for a lengthy response.

      The labels of who is leader and who is follower are similar here (ie. President Macron is the leader and the French public are the followers); however, the difference comes when we take a look at the expectations associated with these roles. France is a republic meaning that they adhere very closely to the belief that the happenings of the government etc. are affairs for the people, not just the politicians. Macron is the President for the people, not of the people. There's a very important distinction there that the French take incredibly seriously. Leaders here draw all of their power from the people. Always. The followers determine a lot of what is decided, discussed, and put into play because without their backing, the leaders are nothing. It's very much a servant leadership model. We have this notion in the US, but we are not very connected to it, nor do we have to be because we're not strictly a republic. If you think about the differences in history of the US and France this makes sense, right? The founding fathers were weary of letting the people make governmental decisions because they weren't necessarily as "educated". France put all of their faith in the people, no matter how educated they were, because the educated (read: wealthy) had failed them in the past. So you can see how crucial this distinction is to them given their past.

      Getting back to the protests at hand and how this distinction makes itself apparent. The people are protesting (and in case you were wondering, in addition to the transportation workers, the fire fighters are protesting for better pay, and the yellow vests are still protesting against rising gas prices, so it's quite busy here) because Macron wants to change their retirement pension system and raise the retirement age from 62 to 64. Since this legislation is not backed by the people it directly impacts, he is in violation of this, frankly, sacred partnership between their leadership and followers. The French are an incredibly politically involved people. They show their distaste in full-fledged riots (I'm not exaggerating, take a look at some of the footage and you'll understand why I've been getting daily updates from the US embassy). Protests and strikes are expected here. What isn't normal is that this has been going on for months and nothing has changed. Typically, the opposing sides will have met and found common ground by now, but neither side is budging. Because Macron has not relented, people have been, quite literally, calling for his head because he is not fulfilling his role as leader. I guess you can take the people our of the 1700s but you can't take the 1700s out of the people.

      Thanks for the question!

      Delete
    2. Hi Rowan,
      First, thank you for replying so quickly to my last comment about the roles of leaders and followers. It was very insightful and led me into my next question. Based off the idea of affairs of the government are affairs for the people, is the power distance high or low between leaders and followers? From the example you provided, it seems to me that the power distance would be considered low. However, I had the opportunity to meet and briefly work with some French executives for one of my internships and observed a high power distance. In that case power seemed to be highly centralized and hierarchical with the one gentleman appearing to have more privileges and be less accessible to his team members. Is my experience representative of the norm there based off of your experiences so far, or am I correct in assuming that there is a low power distance?

      Delete
    3. Hey Jordan!
      My professor of Contemporary French Politics was actually talking about this just today! It isn't necessarily that there is a low power distance between the followers and leaders, it is that the followers know how to leverage what power they do have in an effective way. Let me explain.

      Although there is this sort of accessibility to leaders, there is still a pretty high power distance between the leaders and followers once leaders are in office, though this is not always what the followers intend/want. The French put a lot of trust and rely heavily on their government for their "welfare" programs, this in of itself creating a power difference. The French people don't like to necessarily recognize that. However, this cannot be helped because of the legitimate power that comes with having such control and influence. To combat this, the people often seek out and vote for "the every man," which Macron sort of presented himself as during the election season. A lot of the criticism against his administration today is because the people feel that he is now showing that he is disconnected from those that he is serving (queue the protests against his various reformations that are made with good intentions, but in actuality cause more hardship).

      What I think is different here is that there is the ability for the leaders to be held accountable by the followers in the event that their needs are not met. As I said before, there is not a whole lot we can do in the US mostly because our system is so dispersed and so widespread over various levels of government and states! (For reference France is about the size of Texas and Paris about 1/7 the size of Austin, in terms of landmass). If we want to protest, it must be massive and all encompassing. Here, a few riots and stand offs with the police are cause for national emergency and are reason enough for leaders to reevaluate their leadership style/behavior. So even though there is this power difference, the people still hold a considerable amount of leverage. I highly suggest you check out information on the Riots of May 1968 or the General Strike of 1995. Both are great examples of the power that the people can leverage if the need arises despite the apparent power distance.

      So it's kind of a "both and" situation, right? And it's complicated! Not unlike US politics. Things are constantly shifting and changing and these observations are all relatively generalized statements. It can vary from private sector to public sector, business to organization, and leader to leader. It's hard to give a solidified answer because it really depends on so many variables. But I hope this helped to clarify a little bit!

      Thanks again for your great question!

      Delete
  4. Hello Rowan,

    I found your post to be really interesting, particularly concerning the differences in their perceptions of body language and facial expressions. While I had learned from a communication course that different cultures have very different perceptions of these types of interactions, I did not really understand until reading this post. I would imagine that trying to adapt to these norms is a difficult task coming from a place where everyone is smiling and waving while walking along the mall. A question I have about this is have you found these differences to show in leadership styles? By that, I mean here I find it very common for people in leadership positions to make eye contact as well as offer warm facial expressions to try and include others as well as keep attention so I am curious as to whether this is different in their leadership styles?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Taiylor!

      Oh, it definitely translates--at least from what I've seen. I've noticed it quite a bit in class in different behaviors that my professors exhibit. It's a lot more blunt than in the US and a lot less focused on the relationship building aspects of leadership. My professors will read grades out to the whole class or ask you to post your corrections online for everyone to see. They will tell you very directly when you're wrong (no partial credit or "that's an interesting perspective, I hadn't thought about it that way before" to be seen). My polisci professor told us point blank on the first daythat if touch our phones during his class, he will fail our participation grade. This same professor has us do weekly news recaps and after each person speaks my professor, who sits very still and very straight faced at the front of the class just says, "Okay. Next." regardless of how articulate, elaborate or insightful your response might be.

      None of this to say that they are cold people. I have gotten to know my French professor really week over the past couple weeks and he is one of the coolest dudes I've ever met. My polisci professor has an amazing wealth of knowledge and is incredibly funny. They just cut down on a lot of the fluffy, extra stuff that we tend to see as polite because for them, it doesn't matter to them. It's just a different approach to being. There is absolutely the chance to build those kinds of relationships, you just have to be proactive and do that on your own time.

      I can't speak to life outside the classroom but I would guess that it isn't that different. It was a strange thing to try and connect to at first but if you give it time and put in the effort on a more individual level, you can see the relationship building behaviors are in fact there. They just aren't the number one priority.

      Thanks for the question!

      Delete
  5. Hey there Rowan,

    I have loved keeping up with your adventures and hearing about what you are learning so far! I'm sure it has been quite interesting to become immersed in a culture that is similar but quite different to the United States, especially from a college community that is so close-knit and where people yell hello across campus.

    Going off that thought, I share the interest of the former commenters about the dynamics of conversation and interaction because of introversion. On the Hoftsede Insights country comparison tool, it explains that France is much higher than the US (86 compared to 46!) on uncertainty avoidance and higher on power distance. You mentioned that Parisians are often quick to make judgements because of their preference to not be surprised and to be able to control situations, explaining that uncertainty avoidance. My question is, how do the French typically respond to charismatic new leadership or new trends? Do you think their reluctance to be overly extroverted and quickness to judge might be linked to opening up to someone that they can't control and fear might become disconnected from them? I saw in a previous comment that they often opt to elect "the every man"; do you think this might be because such a leader is more predictable and solid?

    I hope that all makes sense. Thank you for your wonderful updates!

    Braeden

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Braeden!

      Sorry for the long reply-- I haven't had time in between Midterms to educate myself on Hoftsede's theory! From what I see, the French, at least with the older generations are far more likely to stick to the "French way" or the traditional way. For example, Macron's new pension program that spurred all the transportation protests has been criticized for being too "American" although it really isn't in the grand scheme of things. But it's new and it's not traditional so people don't like it. Things are slow to change here and new ideas are slow to be adopted because you have to get through hundreds of years of history and trauma. When things changed quickly in the past, royal families got beheaded or their country got occupied. It's safer to stick with what you know.

      I absolutely think it's a matter of trust and of stability. Charismatic people are all fun and well but it's a mask and you can't be sure what's under it. If you look at prominent French political figures (Charles de Gaulle or Jacques Chirac) not many of them were known for being likeable or agreeable, but they were seen as capable which is what really mattered. Macron was a little different as he was perceived by many French to have been charismatic during his campaign. But he seemed capable. And he seemed stable. A lot of people went out on a limb for his "centrist" movement and feel that they have been deceived. They feel that this sort of "everybody's party" was used as a front for his more conservative, "American" ideals. This deception, to my host mom and other Marcon-sceptics, is result of his charismatic front, to be sure.

      It's very confusing and very hotly debated. It's also hard to piece out because each French person will tell you their opinion like it's fact so I tend to take a lot of the political yammering with a grain of salt.

      Thanks!

      Rowan

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Rowan,

    I hope you are having an amazing time in Paris! I was very intrigued to read about the introverted lifestyles that the French live. I honestly believe I could live a life like that. It would definitely be a change from the American ways of knowing everyone's business and having to start a conversation in order to just ask simple questions. I do appreciate their needs of privacy that they have. In Hofstede's insights, he discusses task vs. orientation relationships. Would you describe the French as being more task driven, as they are not as concerned with forming a relationship with someone that they meet on the street? I also found it very different how a simple smile can mean so much to them. I would definitely need an adjustment period in order to transition to that mindset. I find it so interesting how body language is perceived so differently in different countries. In Defining Global Leadership, Dr. Perruci discusses the time horizon dynamic. It seems to me that the French hold a directive, or transactional leader- follower bond.

    I miss you lots , and hope you are doing well!
    Jackie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Jackie!

      I totally agree, at first it was really jarring to live in such an introverted place, but it is nice sometimes. People are totally okay with going to museums or movie theaters alone so it takes away a lot of social pressure (except from my host mom, she's a huge extrovert even by American standards, but then again she's obsessed with the US so it tracks). It's nice to have a break from the expectations of an extroverted world!

      I would say that they are absolutely more task focused. Even in just getting from place A to place B, they are focused. They will mow you down if you don't get out of their way, literally. Even the language itself or their conversations are direct and to the point. You just tell it as it is and that's that, no beating around the bush or fluffiness to be found. I think this shows too in most leadership interactions here as they are often more on the side of transactional or directive styles. They can and will build relationships, in fact the personal relationships that they have are often very close and very intimate. The separation between public and personal lives is incredibly important here. At work, on the street, you have things to do and places to be. It isn't the place to be making friends and forging connections.

      I miss you lots too! Sending all my love!

      Rowan

      Delete
  8. Hi Rowan! Wishing you well in Paris!

    Your cultural insights display a level of self-awareness that I think will serve you well abroad. In Global Leadership, we just finished discussing Fons Trompenaars Models of Culture, and I think you have outlined several differences and similarities between American and French culture very clearly, such as how both cultures have a great desire for certainty and control, falling on the Internal Control side of the spectrum. It sounds like French culture is even more Specific (separating work and personal lives) and Neutral (controlling emotions) than American culture based on how they do not make eye contact on the street or smile.
    What have your friends or peers in Paris noticed about you that they found culturally different? Did they notice anything you had not?
    Best Wishes,
    Lauren Eakle

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Lauren!

      I would say that is a very accurate description! My friends have all had very similar experiences so it's really nice that we can all share that. The other night a group of us got dinner and we had a relatively lengthy conversation that was just us sharing weird stuff our host families do and feeling validated when everyone else noticed similar things. It's nice to have that kind of confirmation that all the quirky stuff we're experiencing is normal, at least to some extant.

      Thanks for the question!
      Rowan

      Delete

Post a Comment